The wiki is currently undergoing some major improvements. If you need some information and you don't know where to look, please come to #ecnet
Difference between revisions of "Appeals Cases"
From ECNet Wiki
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Daryl v ECnet]] - Regarding the nature of spamming, clarified the anti-spam rules. | [[Daryl v ECnet]] - Regarding the nature of spamming, clarified the anti-spam rules. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Twins v ECNet]] - Regarding the ban of what were called repeated abuses, reaffirmed their being banned. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:27, 6 July 2006
The following are the cases which the appeals committee has taken.
Daryl v ECnet - Regarding the nature of spamming, clarified the anti-spam rules.
Twins v ECNet - Regarding the ban of what were called repeated abuses, reaffirmed their being banned.
